David Shapiro’s column about Sylvia Luke has implications (“Luke bribery case could pit what’s legal vs. what’s right,” Star-Advertiser, Volcanic Ash, Aug. 2). Alexander Silvert, former federal public defender, is credited with prompting the investigation after the Legislature stalled for three years, but says the case is weak legally — to which Shapiro asks, why not approach it from what’s right? Interesting.
